Archive for August, 2008

Continuing the Conversation on Ashtanga Teacher Standards Changes

Last week I posted about how the Ashtanga Teachers Standards were changed, and reflected on how it would affect Ashtanga Yoga.

Since the post there have been comments from readers and also some reactions on other websites. Notable amongst these is the post entitled New Frontier from the blog Visions of Cody. The piece is written by a marketing strategist from a “strategic marketing perspective.”

Cody asks what the intention behind the changes are, and since they are not clearly stated we have to try to infer them. He posits that it is:

To exert control over the transmission of the Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga system by reducing the number of officially authorized/certified teachers.

He thinks this will substantially reduce the number of Ashtanga teachers and make the current teacher shortage even worse.

The question of enforcement is brought up:

Which brings up another interesting question: how is the Jois family ever going to enforce these rules? I don’t believe that they own the trademark on the name Ashtanga in the U.S. (please correct me if I’m wrong.) Therefore, they can either ask practitioners to shun non-authorized teachers/studios (a marginal tactic at best) or they can attempt to get the service mark.

Which naturally leads to a comparison with Bikram Yoga (how ironic). A few years ago Bikram yoga “went legal” on studios which did not abide to its official rules, threatening law suits. A lot of studios which could not practically comply with the rules decided to change the name to “Hot Yoga” and slightly modify the official sequence.

Here’s his conclusion in full:

In the end, I think these changes will have a minimal impact in the US. Unless the AYRI aggressively attempts to shut down non-authorized studios (which I doubt,) then the only thing that will change is that basically nobody (with a few exceptions) will be authorized to officially teach Ashtanga so therefore the authorization of Ashtanga teachers will be an irrelevant qualification.

I do feel sorry for the prospective teachers that have been making numerous trips for years expecting authorization. That’s one hard lesson in non-attachment.

If the AYRI does pursue the legal route, then the Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga brand will be screwed anyway because there will only be a handful of places to practice. It’ll be like rolling the growth of the practice back to the 1970s level.

Maybe that’s exactly what the Jois family wants – to scale the practice back to just a few true believers. There are rumors that Sharath is taking a few years off and the rest of the family probably can’t handle the current workload for much longer.

I’m guessing that this is a conscious attempt to limit the practice to a smaller group of practitioners that are dedicated true believers and in exchange they’re willing to sacrifice the potential revenue.

If, however, this is an attempt to control the brand and concentrate revenue, then I think it’s a horrible plan. Managing growth is one thing, but choking it to death is quite another.

No matter what, us crafty Westerners will figure out a way to get Ashtanga regardless of what people in Mysore say – the cat’s already out of the bag.

It’s well worth reading and thinking about. Here are some other links on the same subject:

Sweat and Fire: It’s Never the Guru’s Yoga

InsideOwl: Ashtanga and Imperialism
Yoga Vermont

Comments (76)


  1. anonymous said,

    August 19, 2008 at 11:33 pm

    branding? revenue? strategic marketing?

    are we talking about yoga?

    i think you and cody have totally missed the point. this is about keeping Ashtanga Yoga – as Pattabhi Jois teaches it – clean. His teaching has always been very specific. There are a lot of teachers who are teaching what they have been taught and rightly claiming Guruji as their teacher, but then there are more people claiming Guruji as their teacher (and posting a photo with them and him that they’ve taken on their site, as if to prove they’re authentic) and then not teaching what he teaches. This is taking advantage of him and the family and the work that their doing.

    What is happening will clean things up and keep it honest – and will keep overly ambitious, capitalistic, money-hungry, marketing strategist ‘yogis’ in check.

  2. ashtanga anarchist said,

    August 20, 2008 at 3:01 am

    Anonymous … nice post but totally misguided. Since anyone, whether they have studied with the jois family or not can teach ashtanga yoga this move byt he family is just misjudged and divisive. Most students do not care if a teacher is authorised. what they want is good quality tuition and if it isnt 100per cent what jois teaches they do not care. Lets get over the myth that there is a traditional way to teach ashtanga. There is not. Jois has made numerous changes to the system over time which some people choose to overlook.

    How can jois clean up ashtanga yoga. it is in the public domain and any iodiot can set up an ashtanga school and there is nothing the family can do about it. Nothing.

    All of this comes about because now that his grandfather is no longer a force Sharath is trying to impose his will on the students to make them respect him. The thing is none of the long term students who have studied with his grandfather respect sharath and don’t care what criteria he lays down, he is not, and never willbe there guru. the only people who ‘repsect’ sharath are those who are seekign something … authorisation or certification.

  3. stroumfaki said,

    August 20, 2008 at 5:33 am

    Ashtanga as the 8 limbed yoga is in the public domain but maybe they can trademark Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga or invent some other similar name for the system. Then using Bikram’s precedent in the courts all they need to do is copyright the sequences of poses. After that use enforcers (lawyers) to sue the pants out of anyone teaching the style covertly. Next step after that is franchise fees for studios. And we are set: Ashtanga Pure for Sure (Chin Mudra).

  4. kate said,

    August 20, 2008 at 7:20 am

    “none of the long term students who have studied with his grandfather respect sharath and don’t care what criteria he lays down”…
    a pretty bold statement

  5. (0v0) said,

    August 20, 2008 at 9:54 am

    AsAnarch, thanks for your various comments here. I sense that old-timers have less of a need to imagine everything involved here to be purely spiritual–no business considerations whatsoever. I’m really learning a lot from the different perspectives here, and yours is particularly unique.

    People got into all this in the comments at my place the other day too.

  6. rufus said,

    August 21, 2008 at 9:20 am

    i know some “old timers” who have the utmost respect for shartah. they may not consider him their teacher, since he was running around with no pants on at 4 and 5 years old when they were practising in the shala, but they do respect him. maybe you don’t, but maybe you shouldn’t say that none of the older students don’t, since it’s really not true.

    i think sharath also knows that he can’t stop any punter from opening an ashtanga school, but he also knows that he can ensure that those schools that are opened and run by authorised/certified teachers who adhere to the traditional system will offer the “correct method” and so the pure form is out there for those interested in it. i know changes have been made from time to time by guruji. it used to be called the ashtanga yoga RESEARCH institute, now the research is done and no longer in the name!

    everyone will do whatever they’re going to do anyway.

  7. soreknee said,

    August 21, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    The ‘traditional’ method has been modified by many senior teachers because so many students were getting injured – unnecessarily, in their opinions, not as some ‘rite of passage’ as many seem to think it is.
    What’s the upshot of it all? Some senior teachers actually – gasp!- acknowledge Iyengar’s contributions and apply them liberally to Ashtanga. Is that a ‘samskara’ – thinking about how to do a pose without injury before making it a habit?
    Furthermore, and I’m speaking strictly as a very enthusiastic student and by no means a teacher, it’s been said by many authorized and certified teachers that time was SKP Jois offered variations for poses, brought people to the wall and otherwise modified the asanas as people were developing. The current situation is attributed largely to the sheer volume of people practicing in Mysore. Read some interviews with Nancy Gilgoff and see her opinion on how Ashtanga is being taught now in Mysore. People used to study the first 2 series somewhat contemporaneously.
    Ashtanga is a great tradition and should be preserved, but the current situation doesn’t seem likely to benefit more than a small few.

  8. soreknee said,

    August 22, 2008 at 5:36 am
    I invite you peruse Matt Sweeney’s article on the authenticity of Ashtanga.
    Matt learned all of 1+2+3 from SKP Jois and Sharath.

  9. LM said,

    August 24, 2008 at 7:19 am

    You know that Sharath reads all of this right? He does.

  10. doug said,

    August 24, 2008 at 7:47 am

    I prefer to look at things this way.

    The number of teachers acknowledged as accurately transmitting the method taught at the AYRI ( or KPJAYI) has been clarified…


  11. Deane said,

    August 24, 2008 at 8:40 pm

    Krishnamacharya told Indra Devi to go teach after only 12 months practice. He didn’t give her all these rules etc that AYRI seems to love. This practice is no one’s property. AYRI should stop pretending it’s theirs. When Jois dies, things will fall apart. Sharath wont be able to keep it together.

  12. Mysore said,

    August 24, 2008 at 9:20 pm

    Come on this is so bad all these negative thoughts and ideas.
    This is becoming like CNN news. Were do I find the good news about Ashtanga yoga this site is trash.

  13. bifaroufas said,

    August 25, 2008 at 5:54 am

    Good idea. Bury your head in the sand. No CNN and no Ashtanga news. No money making schemes. There are no Ashtanga good news anyway except in our practice.

  14. Kim said,

    September 9, 2008 at 1:21 am

    Why is it that most of the people that post on this as well as other blog sites come across as angry (some downright venomous) and bitter? And why do the least informed seem to have the most to say?

    I’d like to suggest that instead of “inferring” meanings to anything that those who are truly curious ask the source. I’d also like to suggest that there are many interpretations for the new standards. The one I like is not about control or money at all, but about purity. Sharath (who is respected by many, many of Guruji’s old students that I know personally) may be trying to get back to Ashtanga in it’s purest form and may be trying to eliminate some of the truly bad teachers that have sprung up doing their own versions of the practice.

    A true Ashtanga practice is about more than asana. Remember the yamas? Isn’t it time that we were more discerning about the truth and only believed what comes directly from the source? What about ahimsa? Some of these posts drag Sharath’s name as well as “the family” through the mud. Isn’t this hurtful? I have to say, for a yoga website I’ve read some very un yogic things here.

  15. Bill said,

    September 11, 2008 at 3:10 am

    Thank you Kim for keeping it real!

  16. heather said,

    September 11, 2008 at 9:37 pm

    In response to “I have to say, for a yoga website, I’ve read some very un yogic things here.”

    I always find it funny that people have this impression that any yogic site or anything related to yoga it should all be pure, etc…People are supposed to talk like a “yogi” or “Yogini”….but what would that mean exactly. Being very soft and tender and trying hard not to offend someone?

    Personally, I trust those who speak their minds even if rough around the edges than I do those who candy coat their opinions so as to appear more “yogic” like…It’s like people who wear a lot of perfume…one wonders what they really smell like.

  17. soreknee said,

    September 12, 2008 at 6:47 am

    right on heather. beyond that, it’s something that should be addressed because it will definitely impact the way yoga is taught and perceived. it should WORK – it should stand up to prodding and questioning.

  18. reality check said,

    September 12, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    Kim — I’m with you.

    Heather: “. . . people have this impression that any yogic site or anything related to yoga it should all be pure, etc…People are supposed to talk like a “yogi” or “Yogini”….but what would that mean exactly. Being very soft and tender and trying hard not to offend someone?”

    Well — duh! — yeah!

  19. soreknee said,

    September 13, 2008 at 12:39 am

    typical zealots, dismissing any facts that might clash with their convenient delusion. Notice how none of soft tender yogis are offering any insights with regard to the points being made. It’s a discussion that you are shrugging off, not an argument. And it’s an interesting one for many of us. Soft and tender is for the New Age folks. Yoga hurts sometimes and so does the truth, when you cling too hard to the fantasy.
    None of these recent posts address the standards of teachers, the situation of students who have been studying with authorized teachers around the world, the demands placed upon individuals to make trips to Mysore every 18 months – or anything else. All I see is inflammatory rhetoric from people exhibiting what amounts to little more than blind faith. It’s a shame.

  20. heather said,

    September 13, 2008 at 8:18 am

    The world is about contrast….

    You are joking in that yogic sites should be soft and tender…..Please rethink your view that being yogic only means being soft, tender…not offending…However, it also does not mean being rude and uncaring….If you reflect on many of the lessons given by various Guru’s…their lessons were anything but soft and gentle…

    As Soreknee points out the truth hurts…and these discussions are better than not at all…

    To get to the truth we have to trend thru some deep shit…it’s from where the beautiful lotus blooms…re: deep mud…life is not much different.

  21. Trust said,

    September 15, 2008 at 6:55 am

    Trust…. Breath……We are all just students….Be humble that’s what makes a good student and a good teacher.
    At any moment you should be ready for change.
    Be Humble

  22. yogamind said,

    September 17, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    An interesting discussion concerning the list of teachers being created by the newly named K. Pattabhi Jois Ashtanga Yoga Institute. I think everyone who has practiced Ashtanga yoga for a long time owes a great deal to the Jois family but the lineage of Ashtanga yoga has already become a worldwide practice and is no longer a one family affair. Check out a good discussion of the continuation of the Ashtanga yoga lineage by parampara versus nepotism posted on The Ashtanga Yoga Blog at It raises some interesting questions.

  23. MK said,

    September 26, 2008 at 6:45 am

    Ashtanga yoga belongs to the world. But the teacher list belongs to Guruji. It is his and Sharath’s decision to give their blessings for teachers who wants to teach Ashtanga. If they want to clean up the teacher list then so be it.

    Teachers who are not authorised or certified are still free to teach Ashtanga (and still use the same name) but it is up to the student to decide if they want to take a chance with a teacher that may not be teaching Ashtanga the traditional way.

    At the end of the day, it is just a piece of paper to say that you are a authorized teacher. as much as it takes only 200 hrs to be certified as a yoga teacher even if you have never practice a single hour of yoga before in your entire life.

    Most important thing is to find a good teacher, one who can direct you in the right yogic path and do ur practice with diligently and with utmost integrity.

    All these talk about nepotism and money, and being soft and being hard… just go practice…

  24. soreknee said,

    September 26, 2008 at 9:31 am

    MK, I have to disagree with you completely. The registration with the Yoga Alliance, while it isn’t nearly thorough enough, still gives a level of assurance that AYRI authorization/certification does not. For instance one has to study a modicum of anatomy as well has have their actual teaching observed. Neither of these particularly important elements are considered when KPJAYI (as it is now known) grants students the authority to teach.
    The health of a student’s spine and knees is wholly tantamount to knowing the proper sequence and vinyasa count. The current teaching standards in Ashtanga have their priorities flipped the other way – hence the injuries piling up for both students and teachers.
    Nepotism is a strong word but a valid assertion in this case. Soon Sharath will have the last word on all things officially Ashtanga and it seems like he consolidating his influence methinks.
    I think it’s fortunate that most senior teachers (most of whom, it should be noted, live in the States) have diverged from the ‘proper’ teaching to a certain degree. It isn’t to disrespect Patthabi Jois but to save and benefit their bodies and those of their students.

  25. seth said,

    September 26, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    god, you people are idiots.

  26. soreknee said,

    September 27, 2008 at 5:12 am

    seth, seth, is that an example of ahimsa? i definitely have a lot to learn from you. how izzat gonna repair my broken knee from all those premature half-lotus postures? Cuz apparently according to the YOGA KORUNTA you can’t do ustrasana before garba pindasana is mastered, diggit?

  27. akee said,

    September 27, 2008 at 9:16 am

    what is problematic, imho, with ashtanga yoga is not the practice itself but the attitude most take. it seems most are interested in mastering asana as fast as possible and forget about the qualities of observation and dedication that are necessary for progress on the yogic path. all this talk of lotus and such is revealing of the pushing forward attitude that of course will potentially result in injury.

    lotus, if it really matters, will come with patience and steady practice. the standing sequence will open the hips, knees, spine in order to prepare for the compressions of the knee and rotations of the hip required for lotus etc.

    most spend very little time on the fundamental poses (up to parsvattanasan) these poses prepare one for the standing balances which deepen the openings of the hips and knees and develop the strength required to begin the primary series.

    it is not fair to point fingers and wag tongues at others for problems encountered in practice if one is pushing to “get” the next pose or whatever. if the beginning of the practice is not sufficiently developed and understood then what follows will certainly be suffering. too many teachers, authorized, certified, or yoga alliancized, are moving students forward in practice before they are ready.

    students, athletic or not, who hop of the couch at mid life and attend 1 or 2 hour long led classes of any sort of vigourous practice should expect to feel discomfort and pain and to potentially experience a variety of injury.

    the beauty of the mysore style is that one can progress at a pace that is suitable and if their teacher has developed the ability to see and act with wisdom and compassion the student will benefit immensely.

    forget about just “getting” the next pose and study the yoga. follow the hatha yoga to the raja yoga. the ashtanga yoga. all eight limbs.

    a teaching accreditation is good for the resume but ultimately is no indication of ones competence or ability at teaching yoga.

    may all beings be happy

  28. Tanya said,

    September 27, 2008 at 10:44 am

    Akee, I completely agree with you. The mental practices of patience and observation are the most important requirements before beginning a practice such as the primary series.

    It is the responsibility of the student to listen to their body and respect and honor experiences of pain or shortened breath (we all know that the only person responsible for ourselves IS ourselves) however, It is the responsibility of the teacher to make this known.

    I too find unrest in knowing that there are “certified” people teaching yoga with little over 200 hours of teacher training and no required yoga experience but this is why connection with our inner teacher, our awareness, is absolutely essential.

    om shanti

  29. Juan Delmastro said,

    October 6, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    Its amazing how the story of Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga from Mysore (Krishnamacarya-Jois) can be further clarified, and seen as a “modern construction” and not a “sacred and blessed” tradition.

    These masters are saying/doing teachings that may contradict their way of teaching, their own previous personal practices, and the guiding of their own people versus discriminations towards “westerners”.

    No “sacred cow” now….

    I leave you my bloglinks for you to freely review some research I have done already for the past year (use the google flag-translator for your home languague):




    Juan Delmastro

  30. Mysore refugee said,

    October 21, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    I’m in Mysore, unimpressed and getting out. This entire cult of personality has actually forced me to leave my asana addictions bcs the rampant control issues are reminscent of a methadone clinic. Thank god there in no “Ideal” here. Don’t shave your heads kids….unless you look cute. The practice, whatever that is, will be your teacher.

  31. swaroopa said,

    October 22, 2008 at 7:40 am

    Great to hear from you! Refugee!
    I was about to book my flight and room and got this from you!
    I hear the same everywhere at the moment.
    Its the ‘kings new clothes” syndrome out there! I have been before and hated it but was trying again as I was sure I was wrong with how I felt the first time, I thought it was me….Now..can you elaborate?

  32. Rick said,

    October 23, 2008 at 2:43 am

    Cool there are to many people here anyway right now. It is nice with a smaller group of positive yogis.
    There are so many coming in the next few months also. It is great to have people thinking like you or else it would really be way to packed in Mysore.

  33. swaroopa said,

    October 23, 2008 at 8:33 am

    Guys Guys I think we could all be ‘projecting’ right now!?. Yoga is the practice of observing others and youself without judgement! Its ok to think and say what we all feel as it will all change tomorrow; our views thoughts, emotions, everything changes constantly anyway so all this will be irelevant or relevant to each of us soon. Tears are our birthright. The purpose of yoga is to know thyself. If thyself is having a moment of depression or anxiety/judgement/agression, lets look at it, then let it go! In hindsight now may I say there is no use in conforming or informing as each of our journeys are ultimately the same whether we are in Mysore, Austrailia or Antarctica! The ultimate is to stay on the journey…right?
    Remember these words…
    The mind posessesextraordinary powers of creation and imagination that can lead us either into feedom or bondage. A.G Mohan

    If we let go of things our life is going to change. And the reality is that we are actually more afraid of change than we are of death.
    Caroline Myss

    I laugh when they call me a ‘yoga master’. What have I mastered?Just an ongoing exploration. The more we practice the more we sense the infinite nuances. Yoga is an endless journey.
    Rodney Yee

    When you realise how perfect everything is you will tilt your head back and laugh at the sky.
    Gautama Siddhartha

    And beware….

    ”All that we are is the result of what we have thought. The mind is everything. What we think we become”.

  34. camel poes said,

    October 23, 2008 at 5:51 pm

    i get about as much spiritual insight from this blog and these posts as i do from perez hilton. you used to post regularly about things “that mattered”. nowadays you drop some yoga gossip once every 4 or 5 months…step up your game peoples!

  35. ashtanga4life said,

    October 25, 2008 at 8:22 am

    There is an energy created by gazing at the opinions of injured/angry students of a profound tradition.

    When the thumb is grasped in poses such as Trikonasa, particularly when the student has a posterior tilt to the pelvis and tight hamstrings, the teacher should forcibly push the sadaka as hard as possible to cleanse the nadis effectively.
    The tradition of parampara eschews disagreements with one’s guru, and when a student cannot sit in a simple cross-legged position for 15 seconds without rounding the lumbar spine, he should be forcibly contorted into padmasana for at least 25 long ujayi breaths, followed by 10 more (at minimum) in utplutihi.
    Furthermore it is essential that gods Vishnu, Brahmin and Ganesh are addressed thoroughly through practice, and that at all times bramicharya be maintained. There must be retention of vital fluids with the exception of procreation, and even then the homemaker may lose his chances for enlightenment in this lifetime.
    Those aspirants who practice poses such as salabasana and ustrasana prior to mastering supta kurmasana and the like are likely to damage the subtle nerves at the base of the spine.
    Reading this and other sacred text dissolves bad fat at the waist and destroys all diseases, including adultery.


  36. PJ said,

    October 27, 2008 at 6:45 pm

    I am one of the people mentioned who have made several trips to Mysore in the last four years spending over a year there total. I want to express that I respect Sharath a great deal as a Yogi, a teacher and most importantly a man. The word Guru means “Bringer of Light”. Sharath and Saraswati as well as Guruji have brought tremendous light to my life. I have learned so much from all of them. I found Sharath’s conferences this year extremely helpful and inspiring. Particularly because his english is excellent. I think that the critics and the sycophants both need to realize Sharath is a human being! He has been given an incredible responsiblity which none of us can fully comprehend. I personally think he has done a remarkable job with the students and I think the teacher updates are an attempt to get a hold of something that could easily get out of hand given the sheer numbers of students traveling to Mysore wanting to be teachers. How about just being students? I think that the criteria is fair. My only suggestion would be an interview prior to the authorization. I think this would be helpful. A few questions about one’s background and knowledge to make sure the student is aware of the parampara (the lineage) and of the rules. Look, they don’t ask much of us. Too many teachers were disrespecting by hosting “Teacher Trainings” and doing their own thing. If you want to be an Ashtanga teacher at least respect the meager requests of the family. I am just grateful that I have had the blessing of knowing them. I am loyal to Sharath and support him in his decisions. I trust his judgement fully. If you don’t respect him it’s most likely because you wanted something and didn’t get what you wanted ,or,more likely, you have never met him. He’s a superb teacher and a pretty cool guy. Let’s all just chill and enjoy this magical practice that makes life even more interesting! What a blessing!
    Om shanti!

  37. ashtanga4life said,

    October 28, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    Do you think making long-term trips to India every 18 months is a meager request?
    Richard Freeman, David Swenson, and Tim Miller continue to hold teacher trainings, ones where they actually train someone to teach and not just practice.
    Are they disrespecting the Guru? They have been practicing Ashtanga pretty much as long as Sharath has been alive.
    I guess these and other teachers have disciples and devotees just as the teachers in Mysore do. It’s up to anyone to decide who has the last word on authenticity, but as it’s been said before, that cat’s out of the bag with Ashtanga. It’s not just for Brahmins anymore!

  38. PJ said,

    October 29, 2008 at 1:07 pm

    Right on. Richard and Tim have permission to do what they do. I’ve met both of them and consider them and many others to be genuine masters. So they have their things going and Sharath has the main shala and ridiculous numbers to deal with. How long does it take to know someone in those conditions? Mysore is a tough little pressure cooker. Sharath keeps it hot and intense. His rules may not be meager to some. To some, these requests about 18 months and no teacher training and pushing through second series and the rest of it is too much. Thank goodness for Richard and Tim and other Certified and Authorized Teachers who are available around the world to share the practice. I believe there is a fine line being walked right now between maintaining the Parampara (the lineage) and proliferating the system around the world so more humans can take the benefit of this magical practice. Like magic though, if taught by someone who has not at least refined their own practice to a certain degree, it has a tendency to invite harm. Sharath’s just trying to keep it pure for sure you know. Got any good ideas on how he could do a better job? Personally, I think he’s done a great job under pressure, and I think it’s great that he is taking some time off to reflect and perhaps prepare himself for this position. As a result, Certified and Authorized teachers will be called upon to share the practice with the interested world. Let’s not forget Saraswati as well my babas. She is the backbone of the operation and still holds it down with grace and love. As far as I know she is still going to teach. I have great affinity for Saraswati and will happily visit her during the break. To each their own taste my babas. Not everyone has to dig the Mysore Masala, but I dig it the most. Peace out to all beings everywhere.

  39. ashtanga4life said,

    November 2, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    “Richard and Tim have permission to do what they do.”

    Where on the KPJAYI site does it say you can obtain teacher training from Richard Freeman, Tim Miller, or anyone outside of KPJAYI?
    The way Richard and Tim teach is definitely different than how yoga is taught at KPJAYI.

    “Like magic though, if taught by someone who has not at least refined their own practice to a certain degree, it has a tendency to invite harm.”

    Everyone has stories about being injured in Mysore. Apparently Sharath has his own interesting tale to tell as well. They may as well just say that injury is par for the course to be fair to the students. Especially when he is giving talks saying that alignment will just happen through regular practice. Lord have mercy.

  40. PJ said,

    November 3, 2008 at 6:32 am

    It doesn’t say everything on the website. Nothing is really set in stone. Ask Richard or Tim if they have permission (from Guruji) if you are that curious. This is the shift. Sharath is just now taking some control. So there is a period of unrest as the shift takes place. This seems natural to me. “Everyone has stories of being injured in Mysore”? I’ve spent over a year of my life in that shala and I have witnessed no injuries (except in scooter accidents). The practice itself demands ridiculous motion from the body. Any movement from dance to sports to yoga can cause injury. I know people who have injured themselves sleeping! All this caution and fear in the world of yoga today…. in the world today; Sharath gives the best adjustments I have ever received. Why all the animocity towards him? I also agree with him that practice does align your practice. I studied Iyengar yoga for over 5 years and found it too tedious especially in the beginning. I was expected to have perfect alignment when I had an asymmetrical stiff body. I have an anatomical short leg and broke 16 bones in various accidents growing up. I have gotten much more aligned doing this practice regularly than I ever did using props and getting scolded by a school marm. Sharath’s practice is deeper than we know and he has much to share. He is young and cannot be expected to be the new “Guruji” over night. If you don’t like him don’t go to Mysore. One less hater to worry about. There are too many dabblers and trash talkers making trips now anyway. He is my primary teacher ,and I can’t just sit here and let people trash him. He’s helped me in my life and in my practice (which are becoming one in the same). I know many people have had rough times in Mysore. Some have had real slaps in the face. I too have had terrible hardships there both in the shala and out. These struggles have refined my character a bit and hopefully made me stronger. It’s nowhere near perfect ,but it is amazing and powerful. I empathize with those that have been rejected or hurt. May they find a better way to get where they want to go. There are many of us who are devoted to Sharath ,and we believe in him. What happened to you? Lastly, sometimes injuries are blessings in disguise. I personally needed to injure myself to restructure certain parts of my body to be more mobile. Exercise injures. That is the nature of it. We tear it down to stimulate the body into being stronger and more flexible. Most people injure themselves in the practice by being too aggressive. Sharath has told me to relax my face and has corrected my alignment many times. You ever have to work with 2 or 3 hundred people a day? It’s impossible for him to do everything for everyone. I am sick of all the selfish greedys and I am sure he is too. Don’t like the way it’s going, DONT GO TO MYSORE! It’s too crowded anyway. IF IT’S TOO HOT STAY OUT THE KITCHEN!

  41. Anon. said,

    November 5, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    QUESTION: Is this mentality common to the present generation of “dedicated” students in Mysore?

    I would hope the tradition would neither attract nor foster consciousness that is so childish, injured, defensive and conflicted.

    But maybe this is exactly where we’re at now.

    Good luck, PJ.

  42. PJ said,

    November 5, 2008 at 7:32 pm

    Typical hater mentality. I guess we should all just be critical, mean and demeaning to others. Let’s all just rip on our teachers and each other Anon. I can honestly and happily admit to being childish (kids rule!), and I most definitely know injury. I am at times conflicted ,but practicing usually helps. If defending one’s teacher is defensive than I’m that too. How about you? Have anything to share about yourself? Any constructive ideas about Ashtanga? Or are you just another critic lookin’ for something to hate on. I don’t need luck baba. I got love in my heart and gratitude for this amazing practice and its teachers. Lastly, Mysore has seen just about every mentality you can imagine. The shala has been shared by people of all races, sexes, colors, creeds, sexual orientation, athletes, artists, kids, the disabled and many other types of folks. Each has there own story and “mentality”. Why do we as ashtangis all have to be the same? Unity with Diversity; can you dig that? Cuz that is where we are at! “Remember remember the 5th of November!” Now stop hatin’ fools! One Love!
    “My country is the world and my religion is doing good.” -Thomas Paine

  43. Anon. said,

    November 5, 2008 at 8:29 pm


    The question was not asked in hate. Thanks for your honest response. Your practice sounds sweet and honest, even if you are defensive at the moment. :) Sincerely,


  44. PJ said,

    November 6, 2008 at 6:47 am

    That’s more like it! Thank you baba. Unity is Strength! I pray for a day when we can celebrate our differences. I pray that the founders and leaders of this yoga keep things alive with the same love and compassion as those before them. Peace to you Anon ,and peace to all those folks who have been hurt along the way either emotionally or physically. I hope these discussions improve our connections with the practice and each other. One love.

  45. uhom said,

    November 8, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    The future of the shala in Mysore looks dismal if we have to go by the Sharath the world gets to know through published interviews. Since he is a teacher offering a service, it’s fair to critique him in public and the idea that it’s some sort of unholy desecration is both untrue – and frankly frightening in this day and age.

    There is only anecdotal evidence that people have experienced minor injuries routinely in Mysore. But I’m inclined to believe it, although I haven’t been there myself. I’ve studied with many authorized teachers who went to lengths to adhere to ‘Guruji’s’ teachings – to, in their words, be ‘merely a vessel’ for what they learned in Mysore.
    What I noticed in Mysore classes here in my town was that most if not all students had chronic pain of some sort that went beyond what one might construe as acceptable or ordinary ‘exercise soreness’. This was most commonly knee, shoulder, wrist and back related. In my own situation, modifications were treated with little patience.
    Furthermore some teachers (authorized in fact) had chronic joint issues that they couldn’t resolve as well. They were told “practice and all is coming” – which they did heed to the letter – and they taught that way, too.
    I was the most consistent practitioner at the shala hands down, and it was interesting to observe how the classes kept getting smaller. It seemed like every visiting student who would drop in had injuries as well. It’s unlikely as long-term students of this school of asana that they were overstating they severity of their discomfort.
    I apologize for taking up space on a site that is really meant for those who practice ashtanga yoga. As you might have guessed, I gave it a try and decided I can’t anymore. It was a struggle for me personally, because I fell in love with the intense atmosphere and the austere commitment of long-term practitioners.
    It occurred to me that perhaps Mr. Jois has a unique and magical way of transmitting information that goes beyond words – but that few are really capable of teaching this way.
    I do actually take issue with the idea perpetuated by believers that this particular form of asana practice is somehow uniquely connected to Patanjali. That’s a towering claim that needs to be substantiated and never has been. Of course anyone interested might have come across references to a text called the Yoga Korunta which has never been seen. People really believe this and teach this, and it’s incredibly unfair and misleading.
    It’s not to say that study of philosophy and scriptures is unimportant, or that they haven’t been formative or at least influenced the development of the contemporary thing we call ‘yoga’ in the west. In order for the study of the art to grow and remain vital, I don’t think it can remain the sole intellectual property of a medieval, caste-constrained society. Krischnamacharya’s teachings evolved a lot during his long life, and whether conservatives like it or not it will continue to change and adapt to the needs of the practitioners – not the other way around.
    Some practitioners have a more ‘extreme sports’ kind of aesthetic with regard to practice – that the primary objective is confronting fear even if you get banged up sometimes. It sounds so exciting! But over a lifetime I would argue it has certain diminishing returns. I guess that might explain why so many westerners in Mysore visit the much-less-expensive MRI there.
    I’m really inspired by the zeal of the ashtanga community and thank you for this great forum. Take care of yourselves!

  46. PJ said,

    November 8, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    Anyone else want to discuss this one? I’m feeling like a spokesman for Mysore and the main shala. I’m usually the quiet one. I’m just in love with it. Not everyone digs it as much I guess. I think there is a yoga out there for everyone now. Yogabootybellydance anyone? Thanks Uhom. Your opinions and honesty in sharing your experience is aprectiated. I think you make some important points. Hmm…. the yoga korunta. I’ve seen photocopies of pieces of it. It was supposedly devoured by ants. Any scholars out there that can tackle this one?

  47. Ernesto,Brazil said,

    November 9, 2008 at 5:17 am

    My Time,
    People here talk about Injuries , Sharath, New rules in the shala,
    Mysore …………., Now about number of students in class , Patanjali , Crazy . It is just about complaining and criticizing , I just have fun reading these comments. One here talk about Sharath injuries and back problems, My Father has back problems and never practice ashtanga .
    Maybe ashtanga is not for you people, it is like for me golf, ballet , hunting , etc ; When you do something in life that you truly like and have a meaning you will do , believe , respect , love ………. you dont have to understand so much you just do.VERY very very very very EASY.
    Find something that make sense to you and go for.
    Keep Smiling and have FUN,
    SUPER FOODS ( Hemp Protein, Spirulina, Maca , Cacau , Goji, Açai, Coconut oil and BEE POLLEN )

  48. uhom said,

    November 9, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    That’s so interesting. My mom doesn’t practice ashtanga and doesn’t have back problems. Sounds like you’ve been conducting a serious study. Oh, wait…

    I don’t know where to start with you. The gist of your statement, if I’m not mistaken is that vast subject of asana practice and tutelage is better off not being discussed altogether. This attitude is anti-intellectual, in the same way that Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska, is.
    Your Guru wrote a detailed book on the principles of asana and its philosophy. He also expresses some of his forceful opinions of contemporary Indian society. I wonder if you’ve made time to read Yoga Mala or any of the scriptures it references. Many of the concepts don’t evoke smiles or fun.
    Iyengar injured himself doing Hanumanasana. Does that mean that it can’t be done without injury? Does that mean it can’t be taught without injuring the practitioner? Iyengar has written volumes on the subject. Should he have just kept smiling and having fun?
    The art of asana is a deep, wide, ocean. Some of us really want to practice and teach in the best way possible. Sometimes you have to argue and have discussions to ‘learn stuff’.

    I’m sorry you find that unappealing.

  49. Ernesto,Brazil said,

    November 10, 2008 at 8:42 am

    Should he have just kept smiling and having fun?
    No No No No No , I will , you dont have to be sorry because I dont find that unappealing .
    For me is ok is you want to argue and have discussions to ‘learn stuff’.NO PROBLEM.
    Yoga Mala , I read more than 10 times (Practice and all is coming and Yoga is 99% practice e 1% theory) Sri K. Pattabhi Jois.
    Many of the concepts don’t evoke smiles or fun. I never say that. Sarah Palin WHO?
    Happiness on the face, light in the eyes, a healthy body-these are the signs of a yogi, according to the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the classic Sanskrit text on hatha yoga, I can find more but .
    What is perfect asana, and how do you perfect asana? “Sthira sukham asanam (YS 2.46).” Perfect asana means you can sit for three hours with steadiness and happiness, with no trouble. After you take the legs out of the asana, the body is still happy. In the method I teach, there are many asanas, and they work with blood circulation, the breathing system, and the focus of the eyes (to develop concentration). In this method you must be completely flexible and keep the three parts of the body – head, neck, and trunk – in a straight line. If the spinal cord bends, the breathing system is affected. If you want to practice the correct breathing system, you must have a straight spine( An Interview with Sri K. Pattabhi Jois).
    About BKS IYENGAR the little that I know Krishnamacharya ask him to do Hanumanasana and he never did before that asana then he jump over Iyengar legs. BUT I WASNOT THERE. Main page go.
    Please read what Guruji say about the science of yoga .
    Let me ask you just that when you fell some happiness in life or doing something that you like to do , do you smile? It is fun ?
    Simplicity, Santocha all yamas and niyamas Is part of my life .

  50. PJ said,

    November 11, 2008 at 7:47 am

    So, I have been searching for more on the Yoga Korunta. Nothing. Here is my conclusion. Even if Ashtanga yoga only goes back as far as Krishnamacharaya (Highly doubtlful), it is still the most complete, clear and pure style of yoga I have come across in this life. In the book “The Yoga of the Yogi” by Kaustub Desikachar (awesome book) Krishnamacharya described his worst fear for teaching westerners was the commercialization of yoga. He dreaded the thought of Yoga as a commercial enterprise. Here in my town, we have corporate yoga studios funded and supported by psychiatric clinics, monolith health clubs with 10 different teachers. The US and Europe now offer every type of commercial yoga the mind can fathom from Iron Yoga to Hip Hop Yoga. I believe The great Guru would be profoundly disheartened by all this. Guruji and the family never claimed to be perfect. They don’t walk around claiming to be saints. They are real people doing their best to keep this style intact and serving its purpose which is to liberate people. They could make a killing from doing “teacher trainings” but they don’t believe in them. Krishnamacharya never did a “teacher training” nor did Guruji or BKS or Tim Miller or Richard Freeman or many of the “Great teachers”. Years ago I taught martial arts. I never attended a martial arts teacher training. I don’t think they exist. I reached a certain level of proficiency (black belt) and was asked to share my practice. I have friends and family in college education. One teaches photoshop and the other is an art professor. Neither of them ever took an education class. They simply studied and practiced their medium and as a result of having a brain they can share that info with others. Teacher trainings serve only one purpose and that is fattening the pockets of the host. There is a local Ayurveda/Yoga institute that sprang up here a few years back that certifies about 60 or more yoga teachers a year. It’ a 3 month course which requires no yoga experience. Many of these “certified yoga teachers” have a three month old yoga practice and now they are teaching! “First become student then share your practice” -Guruji 2007. This discussion is about the changes in teacher authorization requirements. I know these changes were a direct result of this “commercialization” of yoga Krishnamacharya feared all those decades ago. Mainly teachers in America and Europe have gotten greedy. They can’t resist the big and easy money one can earn by doing teacher training. This is why many don’t want to use the approved name “Ashtanga Intensive”. There’s no money in it! Everyone in the west wants to be a teacher. Soooo, as a result Sharath is making it harder to get and harder to keep. I say good. When every time I turn around and another fitness instructor or housewife lookin’ to supplement her income is now a “certified yoga instructor” I feel a shiver like it’s all coming apart. I have immense gratitude and respect for Shri K. Pattabhi Jois and his family for keeping the old style intact and not changing it to Jois yoga or Sharath yoga. I am grateful that the pratice is so challenging and strong and even dangerous. I am grateful that they make it sooo hard to be an authorized and certified teacher. These things give me hope that it will still be around in its intact form for the next generations to come. Uhom and the others who don’t practice ashtanga and have no taste for it have unlimited options for other yoga styles now. Find one that suits your needs; or, go with the current trend which is make up your own. Me, I dig my yoga like my food and art……
    authentic and spicy! I’ve never blogged before ever. This is my first one. Like I said previously I am usually quiet in these matters. However, this practice has helped me find my voice. It has helped me to be more bold than ever. Thank you to Shri K. Pattabhi Jois, Saraswati and Sharath for sharing your practice with me. It continues to serve me well. Vande Gurnam

  51. PJ said,

    November 11, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    Please excuse the miss spelling in my last post. I seem to be getting worse at that with age. I have one final note about the Yoga Korunta. Krishnamacharya himself validated its existence. Guruji believes it existed; so to doubt its existence is to doubt these great Yogis. Given both their lives as examples I have no reason to think it was made up. I wish someone out there had more info on it…..

  52. swaroopa said,

    November 11, 2008 at 3:08 pm

    It was ”eaten by ants”

  53. swaroopa said,

    November 12, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    seriously!…. thats aparantly what Guru G said

  54. ama said,

    November 14, 2008 at 1:14 pm

    You all seem like you know a great deal about Mysore,sorry to put this in here- but got to ask….does anyone know a nice place to stay near the AYI Shala – (not too tacky- I have a reasonable budjet)!
    Sorry to ask but not a clue where to stay, apart from hotels which id rather not do.

  55. ERBR said,

    November 15, 2008 at 6:40 am

    Hi, Ama

    About Housing and info,

    Shiva mobile( 98 44226 082 / Phone 0821 4288936 )
    Anu`s and Ganesh mobile ( 98452 79513 / Phone 91 821 4288120)
    Krishna Murthy; (0091)9880265622 – email:

    They will help you ,

    Take care.

  56. ERBR said,

    November 15, 2008 at 6:50 am

    Sorry ,
    I forgot the area code in Ganesh mobile and Shiva mobile and phone (0091)number.

  57. ama said,

    November 15, 2008 at 10:10 am

    Many thanks ERBR

  58. smackasana said,

    November 21, 2008 at 6:13 am

    yo haters i bought me some yoga korunta on ebay. it has all six series of the ashtanga system exactly as guruji teaches it, compleat wit treatment to cure all disease and THE translation of the sutras.
    my friend an archaelogist carbon dated it to 5 million years old so it proves everything.

    stop hating on guruji and his grandson

  59. ama said,

    November 24, 2008 at 5:31 am

    This is amazing!! Where can I get one!!
    Great news. Please let me know where I can get one!
    And I am sure we all dont hate Sharath and Guru g. They are an inspiration to the West and an inspiration to the lineage.

  60. smackassana said,

    November 26, 2008 at 11:13 am

    I don’t think other copies exist and since I bought mine, ants have eaten most of it. Then I had this dream where Ganesh appeared to me and told me I couldn’t show any humans the Korunta, but I could feely quote from it.

    Here is the opening verse

    “In the beginning there was 5 series and then Shiva hath wrought a sixth; whoever shall attempt this sixth and surely final series was thought t’be outlandish by his peers yet it yielded significant powers of bramicharya and other unique abilities.

    The sadaka must pay homage in rupees. Exact change pleeze.”

    Cryptic huh?

    Then there are pictures of ancient 5 million year old yogis practicing kukutasana.
    One difference from the way Guruji teaches and in the Korunta is that Surya Namaskar B ends with a 15 minute hold in kandasana.

  61. ama said,

    November 28, 2008 at 10:47 am

    You make me laugh!
    You are silly!
    Guess you wont be going to Mysore then…!

  62. smackadassana said,

    December 2, 2008 at 10:53 am

    No you have it wrong!
    I am currently in Mysore studying with the Jois family.
    I booked six months at the Southern Star hotel. I figure you can’t really be a yogi without experiencing the culture firsthand, living exactly as they did millions of years ago alongside the dinosaurs. Albeit with air conditioning and the occasional hook-up with one of the lithe young foreign students at the shala.
    I’m looking forward to obtaining authorization if I stay here long enough and won’t have any naughty parties like some formerly authorized teachers did. At least if I do I will keep it chill and on the down low, like my pre-class bong blast. All in the interest of cultivating more ahimsa.
    I hope my dad’s check clears before our big trip to Bangalore. Otherwise I’ll have to cancel my spa appointment.


  63. ama said,

    December 5, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    You are completely MAD ! …Hysterical !! You can’t be serious!
    I am comming out to Mysore on 4th Jan.Yoga mat in one hand – hand grenade in the other (just in case!) – No listen really sorry no, no jokes here about terrorism – its sick.And its poor India’s turn to really go through it at the moment…..Just awful.And I think India’s tourist trade will also suffer a bit.We have to keep going if we can – or maybe wait till its all quitened down at the airports? 4 hr waits for flights…bomb alerts etc etc…
    Anyway whats these naughty parties you mentioned?
    You wont get authourised in a month you nutter !!

  64. smackadassana said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    check it, ask sharath about tarik’s shin dig

  65. ama said,

    December 8, 2008 at 4:56 am

    Hey smackadasana…..Whats – zat?

    whos tarik?…. and what shin-dig?

    Sounds like your all havin a laugh out there? Must be missin out!
    How is it?

  66. smackadassana said,

    December 8, 2008 at 6:40 am

    a shin dig is a partayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
    u have to go to mysore to find out more ama!

  67. ama said,

    December 8, 2008 at 7:14 am

    I know what a shin-dig is nutter…
    Must be fun out there …..ill be there on Jan4th…

  68. Barbara said,

    December 8, 2008 at 7:56 am

    First, sorry for my English.

    I don’t understand all these arguments against the Jois family, they do what they want in their own shala, nobody’s obliged to practice there and follow their rules if they don’t like it.
    There is some teachers I don’t appreciate, so I don’t go in their shala and that’s all.
    As long as you don’t use their name, you are totally free to teach ashtanga without their authorisation, you won’t go to jail or pay a fine for that! And why would you want to use the name or an authorisation from someone you don’t like or don’t trust!?? It’s not logical.

    There is 2 options :
    1) You agree with Sri K. Pattabhi method and rules, you study with them, you remain loyal to them, and you don’t teach without their authorisation.
    2) You don’t agree, it’s you freedom, you don’t waste your time in his shala, you study with someone else, and you don’t need Guruji’s authorisation to teach, but you don’t use his name for your advertisement, and you have the honesty to say that you don’t teach the traditional way, but another way.

    There are non-authorised teachers who claim to teach ashtanga the traditional way as taught by Sri K. Pattabhi Jois (just because they have practiced 1 or 2 months with him), but its not true, if they were teaching the traditional way, they wouldn’t do it without the blessing of their guru, they wouldn’t use the name of someone they don’t respect.
    The practice of Ashtanga is not just about asanas, it’s also about being loyal. I don’t see how someone who is not loyal could teach yoga even if he/she is the more flexible.

  69. Barbara said,

    December 8, 2008 at 8:13 am


    If you want to be very near the shala, I can recommend you to go to Jiothy, in the same street (8th Cross), number 228, but I lost their number and mail, so unfortunatly you cannot contact them before.
    In January, it must be very crowded, its better that you find accomodation before, but if you don’t its better to have this adress than nothing.

  70. ama said,

    December 8, 2008 at 10:23 am

    Barbara you are very kind.
    Thank you.

  71. eaton byance said,

    December 20, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    In his book, Gregor Maehle quotes Krishnamacharya’s Biography as stating that the Korunta was bound together with Pantanjali’s yoga sutras, Vaisha’s commentary on the sutras.

    So thats where they got the idea that it was Pantanjali or Astanga yoga. So Guruji says its Patanjali yoga… but you have to practice it to find out if he tells the truth..;)

  72. gregorfanlite said,

    December 20, 2008 at 8:17 pm

    eaton byance:
    you will notice ‘authorized’ australia-based gregor maehle is nowhere to be found on the teacher’s list at kpjayi website.
    you will also notice jois’ name absent from HIS website (gregor’s website that is)

    maybe sharath is being similarly disloyal to authorized teachers who own businesses (shalas) here in the states that have been teaching with jois’ blessing for more than a decade in some cases who have students practicing beyond the primary series.

  73. ERBR said,

    April 10, 2009 at 4:58 am

    Hi People,

    Today April 10, 2009 is the firt day of R Sharath´s Tour.

    Will be a long tour for many places :

    Geat opportunity for some of you that say this and that about Sharath and the “new rules´´to spend some time and ask him everything that you want to know
    about this topic and the most important listen from himself.

    Love this practice and respect Guru Parampara .

  74. Erena said,

    July 10, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    Do your practise and all is coming. Go inward and find your peace, your teacher and anything else you will ever need. There is no need to fear the changes that are taking place. When you are truly able to let go of fear surrounding your practise e.g. regulations, teachers, injuries etc only then are you free to really do your practise.

  75. Sass said,

    November 21, 2009 at 3:53 am

    OMG, I didn’t even get to finish this but what worries me is how much everybody seems to say about what everyone else is doing. I like that PJ used to just smile benevolently about so much of what goes on in the West… We do this to touch God; everything else is trivial and irrelevant. Our paths are unique. Don’t forget that asana is just a way to cleanse the body and bring it higher folks so doing it like this or that is kind of irrelevant…

  76. Stephen said,

    March 13, 2010 at 7:40 pm

    Less talk, more yoga.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment

Changes in Ashtanga Teacher Standards

In the past few days there have been some changes on the Ashtanga Yoga Research Institute website, There is a new link under the practice category called in capitals TEACHERS LIST.

In contrast with the familiar list of teachers on, this list as of today (August 14 2008) primarily lists certified teachers (not authorized teachers), or a fraction of the total.

The new list on the AYRI site comes with a change in the standards for being listed. To be listed, the website states:

[Teachers] should maintain a yoga room or shala to allow for daily, preferably morning, Mysore-style practice and should honor Saturdays and the full/new moon days as rest days.

In addition, it seems that the requirements for keeping the authorization to teach are being significantly tightened. For example, teachers are asked to :

  • return to India every year and half to study for 2 months
  • have a shala for daily classes
  • refrain from teaching on traditional rest days such as Moon days
  • refrain from teaching any series beyond the primary series
  • refrain from teaching workshops

These requirements look like an attempt to raise standards and the quality of teaching. Perhaps it is due to the notable increase in students and teachers in the past 5 years (we wrote about how the number had at least doubled back in 2006). To me, these changes raise questions about the essence of Ashtanga yoga.

What effect will these new requirements have on the quality of teaching of Ashtanga yoga across the world?

In my opinion, in many ways this is a step in the wrong direction for Asthanga yoga.

Asking for a trip to India every 18 months for two whole months puts a heavy burden on new parents and on those with fewer financial means.

No Workshops?
Workshops provide benefits for both teachers and students, and are a key part in building the worldwide Ashtanga community.

Asking teachers to forgo the extra income from workshops may make it impossible for a lot of them to return to India so frequently, since ironically it is often these very workshops which give the teachers the means to return to do so.

Personally, a lot of what I have learned about Ashtanga yoga is directly due to taking workshops with authorized teachers. Had these requirements been in place when I was starting my yoga journey, I would not have had the amazing opportunities to learn from such talented teachers.

Hundreds of dedicated teachers have devoted their lives to teaching ashtanga yoga. They have made enormous sacrifices to become authorized. It seems unfair to change the rules so drastically and abruptly. The standards are changing in a way that may make it impossible for a lot of teachers to continue teaching as authorized teachers.

In addition, raising the standards in such a way that few teachers meet them could have the perverse effect of lowering the quality of teaching because they become meaningless.

These changes do not seem to be in the interest of the Ashtanga yoga community, and in the continued spreading of this wonderful practice.

These are my initial thoughts and I wrote this because I care deeply about the practice. I welcome your opinions on this important matter.

Comments (65)


  1. stroumfaki said,

    August 15, 2008 at 5:34 am

    This is about money not guru parampara.

  2. embe said,

    August 16, 2008 at 5:44 am

    I just read the AYRI website,it said nothing about not teaching workshops…
    Seems a bit strange not allowing that,is that really correct?
    When I was in Mysore two months ago Sharat spoke in conference about “Teacher trainings” and didn´t seem to like them at all,is that what you mean ?

  3. The Masked Ashtangi said,

    August 16, 2008 at 5:46 am

    I agree, purely about money and control.

  4. laksmi vimalananda said,

    August 16, 2008 at 8:20 am

    It’s pretty disappointing how cultish this has all become anyway, but now, it’s so desperately controlling. Agreed that it is about money. I’ve always thought that the fees were astronomical even by western standards. How much money does a person need? And are people really going to buy into it? I was fortunate enough to study under two certified teachers, but I can say that one was much better than the other–the second was a liability and caused many student injuries. So certification/authorization doesn’t really even mean you can teach. It just means you can do certain poses and you can go to India for a couple of months a year. Buyer beware.

  5. Arturo said,

    August 17, 2008 at 5:02 am

    Hi Phillipe
    The no workshops rule needs verification. Previously the rule spelled out was that there were not to be so called “ashtanga teacher trainings”, but the word “ashtanga intensive” was allowed in reference to a workshop.

  6. rufus said,

    August 17, 2008 at 3:20 pm

    many people not understanding

  7. stroumfaki said,

    August 17, 2008 at 6:19 pm

    The rule about no teacher trainings (even if they are called something else) is old. They have just decided to more actively police the offending teachers by removing them from the certified/authorized list. So some well respected teachers who have been instrumental in helping the spread of Ashtanga are ordered to stop what they are doing: Richard Freeman, David Swenson, Tim Miller etc. ( Richard’s website is called Yogaworkshop, so I think he should be punished more severely than the others! :) ).

    This is included (among other things) in an email sent out by AYRI or as it seems to be called now KPJAYI. “While Certified teachers may travel and provide some workshops, Authorized teachers should be working in one location only”. Translation: If you are authorized forget those money making Mexico/Thailand/Greece vacations!

    We have also heard this one before and it is included in the same email: “No one, Authorized or Certified, should be advancing students beyond an asana they cannot safely and proficiently complete”. So next time I study with Sharmila who is authorized she will have to stop me at… Ardha Baddha Padmottanasana.

  8. ashtanga anarchist said,

    August 17, 2008 at 10:20 pm

    This is ridiculous. Why penalize authorised and certified teachers for doing the right thing and studying with the Guru. Why should non certified/authorised teachers, many of whom barely know the practice, teach how ever they like, offer teacher training and workshops while those people who have been to the source cannot.

    If we are to follow the example of our teachers, as the guru parampara tradition dictates, we would all became avaricious, wealth obsessed and suffer from almost crippling back pain as Sharath regularly does. I have studied with the Jois family for many many years and I resent being ripped off in this way.

    Krishnamacharya did not give his blessing to Jois to teach and then say, “Oh, by the way, you need to come back and study with me each 18 months and yes, you need to pay me a fee for my blessing which was once freely given.” If Jois is so concerned about the tradition he should have stopped Sharath from authorising anyone who asked just so he could get his greedy hands on the money. They created the monster by NOT having proper controls.

    It is time to wake up people and see that these people are now getting to the level of Bikram and his money making schemes.

  9. rufus said,

    August 18, 2008 at 9:47 am

    seems to me many of these comments may be reflections of your own money obsessions. don’t like it? don’t go, don’t pay, don’t practice, nobody cares.

  10. faith said,

    August 18, 2008 at 11:36 pm

    i agree with rufus.

    many people here are not understanding . . . and seemingly very angry.

  11. Amanda said,

    August 19, 2008 at 12:06 am

    Yes, I agree with Rufus as well. It seems to me like many reactions that I am reading here are born out of financial panic.

    Maybe the problem occurs when we expect the fruits of yoga to be financial ones.

  12. heather said,

    August 19, 2008 at 2:24 am

    To be fair, this attempt is to raise the standards to teaching as well as the practice of Ashtanga. So let’s not slam it for only being for money reasons. Certainly that would be part of the picture and the reasoning behind this, but it is only ‘part’ not the whole.

    I believe these ‘rules’ hae been put forth without some serious considerations with respect to practicality and in short, the Western world. I also believe that these ‘rules’ also stem from the obvious cultural differences. Let’s first look at the practical points missing.

    Without a doubt forcing teachers to return to India each and every year is NOT practical. People have families, limited budjets and often other responsibilites that do not allow for this (eg., paying the mortgage and paying the rent). I am quite certain having spent many years in India myself (returning year after year)…that Eastern people do not understand the cost of living is quite a bit higher and that coming to the East to study does involve a loss of income, etc.

    As well, in the East taking off for religious holidays and moon days is very much encouraged and accepted. Perhpas the West is too production oriented, but this is not going to change any time soon. Closing ones’ school on Saturday for a moon day may adhere to the traditional practice but again not to practical means. That is, when students are working people and only attend yoga classes on Saturday’s.

    As for the cultural differences…well, those are interwoven into the practical matters.

    No, I really do not think these ‘rules’ will stand ground for too long. You’ll see they will be revised soon.

  13. mysore said,

    August 19, 2008 at 4:37 am

    You do realize, don’t you, that these rules are nothing new? These were always the rules! Authorized teachers were only ever allowed to teach Primary (not that anyone really followed this rule…). They were always meant to teach regular Mysore classes ie. not just workshops. They have ALWAYS had to return to Mysore every 18 months to renew their authorization (it used to be for 1 month study every 18 months, it seems it’s now 2 ) – still lists teachers who haven’t renewed their authorization but “officially” some of the listed teachers are not authorized anymore because they haven’t been to Mysore for years. And, Guruji and Sharath requested already a couple of years ago that Certified/Authorized teachers stop doing teacher training. Then everyone started calling it “adjustment workshops” etc…maybe this is why they don’t like workshops.
    These were always the rules and every authorized teacher knew them. Nobody just paid that much attention to whether anyone really followed them.
    By the way, the list on the ayri website is not final; new names have appeared and there are people here in Mysore working on it as we speak.

  14. kate said,

    August 19, 2008 at 4:41 am

    Just because the first things that come to your mind is money and control doesn’t mean that they are the first things on everyone’s mind.

  15. faith said,

    August 19, 2008 at 6:13 am

    these were always the rules.

    and it’s only people who aren’t really into the practice as pattabhi jois teaches it who complain. a shala with a full mysore program is definitely possible, but won’t flourish if you suck as a teacher and are totally uninspiring.

  16. T said,

    August 19, 2008 at 6:51 am

    I think reinforcing this is a great idea, it also helps us to realize how difficult this practice is to get recognized as a true ashtanga teacher. Unlike some of the other western-yoga invented practices which are truly out for to make money. Think about it, how many yoga practices have been “created” in the past ten years. Anyone can take a teacher training, make a dvd, write a book, and slap “teacher” on their name, this my friends is ahankara. Sure, the money and the time demands regards to visiting India are an issue for most westerners – but perhaps the trek to India/teaching is not the path for everyone.

    Like so many of the more recent commenters have agreed – nothing has changed. Rules are just being reinforced because they seem to be getting forgotten.

    Further, this practice should not be taken lightly. Why would you trust just anyone to teach you this path? It’s not that I’m saying we should only take practice from certified teachers, we should just be aware who we are following.

  17. ana said,

    August 19, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Thanks for posting on this important topic, Philippe. My two cents… I am simply glad to receive information straight from the horse’s mouth. As incomplete, inaccurate, and/or outdated it may be, an “official” list of teachers from the powers that be is still useful for new students of ashtanga. I have experienced the difference between a mysore class conducted by a certified teacher and one who was neither authorized nor certified to teach. And all I’ll say is “Thanks, Sharath for taking the time to do this”!!

  18. Jazmin said,

    August 19, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    @Faith these were always the rules. and it’s only people who aren’t really into the practice as pattabhi jois teaches it who complain.

    Could you clarify? People who are not insiders (and thus are just learning about these rules for the first time) are not really “into the practice”? Do you have to be an ashtanga scenester to be a “real” ashtangi?

    Honestly. I’m really genuinely asking if it’s the case that practitioners who are out of the loop really don’t understand what ashtanga is truly about.

    A lot of the sparks here seem to be about who is and who is not a real ashtangi. So again, I really am trying to figure out what are the most important criteria. For example, people who see their practice as integrated into daily life in the US–rather than daily life in Mysore–their practice is less deep?

  19. AshtangaNews » Continuing the Conversation on Ashtanga Teacher Standards Changes - Ashtanga Yoga Matters (as taught by Sri K Pattabhi Jois) said,

    August 19, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    [...] Last week I posted about how the Ashtanga Teachers Standards were changed, and reflected on how it would affect Ashtanga Yoga. [...]

  20. ashtanga anarchist said,

    August 19, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Point of information since most of you posting sound like you have not been practicing that long. I have been authorised for many many years and when I was authorised by KP Jois there was no restriction on what you could teach. I was told directly …”teach what you know.”

    Secondly money never came into the equation. Authorisation was given because KP Jois thought you were dedicated enough as a student to pass ont he practice correctly. There was no fee for authorisation and there was no stipulation to return to mysore or to pay every 18 months.

    Thirdly, from my expereince of studying in Mysore over more than 10 years the standard of those authorised dramatically dropped the minute Guruji stopped and Sharath started handing out pieces of paper with the accompanying bill, hence the doubling of the number of authorised teachers inthe past few years.

    Lastly, if this scheme is supposed to increase the level of teching in the ashtanga community why not go after the ever increasing number of people who have never studied in mysore with the family who are now offering teacher training courses? These are the people doing the most damage to the practice, not the dedicated authorised/certified teachers who have shown there commitment to the practice.

  21. bindifry said,

    August 19, 2008 at 10:53 pm

    so…say a person is not authorized, never wanted to be, but has studied faithfully with a certified teacher over 10 years, also has studied in mysore, has taught morning mysore for 6 mornings a week for years, is not doing it to get rich, teaches all over the world for free or very little money (NOT for a vacation but because it is needed when these teachers want to go to india-who do you think watches the students when they are gone for months?)
    has never done a teacher training and shuns workshops (done only when forced to) ? personally i have never wanted that piece of paper. it has created monsters. i have heard of people buying that paper who do not even have a daily practice.

    does this mean this person (me) should not teach this practice?

    if that’s true, i want no part of this ridiculus back stabbing angry system that seems to turn humans into gods (in their own minds). just cause you aren’t authorized does not mean you are not a good teacher who understands how to teach. i offer only asana. if they want the rest of the limbs, i send them to india or a certified teacher. i can not take responsibility for the rest, i do not pretend to know enough.

    why does the ayri bother certifying people if someone like me is not worth anything when studying with them?

    however, i think this was long overdue. i personally have known it was going to happen over a year ago. it happened because too many people are too hungry for that piece of paper. they pay the money, study with piles of teachers (do not have one guru-something guruji speaks of all the time) runs to mysore the amount of times required, and once paper is in hand, starts charging more for their services, even if they suck at teaching.

    i would like to see them get rid of authorization completely and just certify people and allow the rest of us to have them as teachers if we do not want to spend our life in the ayri with a thousand other people, getting zero personal attention year after year. this a good teacher does not make.

    times have changed. there’s too many people in the shala. if you were lucky enough to find astanga before gokalum, you can say that guruji is your teacher. now that is not possible.

  22. faith said,

    August 20, 2008 at 12:26 am


    you don’t have to be a scenester at all to be into the practice.

    when i started the practice, what helped me stay was the extremely dedicated practitioners around me. i saw that things that i thought were impossible were not, in fact, impossible. it was all possible, you have to be diligent.

    so, ultimately, what i was trying to say was that people who are uninspired, unbelieving and not diligent, are the ones always looking for the easy way out. just show up on the mat and practice what you’ve been taught and you will have a profound experience no matter where you are.

    and the rules I was referring to are the rules that apply to you if you want to be authorized or certified under KPJAYI.

    with that said, i totally agree with bindifry. the most inspiring teacher i ever had did not have any pieces of paper . . .

  23. Angie said,

    August 20, 2008 at 12:51 am

    I totally agree with Bindifry. The best teachers I have ever had belong to the group you describe in your first paragraph — no pieces of paper, yet as devoted to Guruji and the tradition as any Certified person (perhaps moreso?). It would be a real shame if these people were punished in any way.

  24. yamma said,

    August 20, 2008 at 1:38 am

    Why is the list on KPJAYI different to that on ashtanga .com?
    i mean, the same teachers do not seem to be listed….. I thought the listing was a list of thos teachers certified/authorisied by Shrath and Guruji

  25. yogini said,

    August 20, 2008 at 5:31 am

    There is a definite difference between an authorised and non authorised teacher and I believe it comes down to faith, faith in the practice, faith in guruji and faith enough to convey to others the method as it is taught in Mysore. This is teaching without flourishes, workshops or skipping postures.

    When one spends enough time in Mysore something transformational can occur. However, it is my experience that if you go to Mysore to get – new postures certification etc – rather than to give respect to the guru of this lineage people end up feeling frustrated.

    AYRI are well within their rights to maintain high standards. Teachers need a teacher and need to be regularly in their presence. Otherwise, in the midst of all of your students putting you on a pedastool the ego can become inflated and people start changing the method according to their own likes and dislikes.

    The reiteration and addition of rules sends a clear message to authorised and certified teachers who then have a choice, return to Mysore or do not profess to be an AYRI teacher. This is in no way a Bikram or Iynegar like trademarking of Ashtanga Yoga, simply a reminder to students of the lineage in which they teach and the required committment to continue to study with their guru.

    Everyone has a choice as to whether they teach with or without approval of AYRI.

    om shanti.

  26. bindifry said,

    August 20, 2008 at 6:00 am

    why does everyone think they are transformed when they go to mysore? can it be that india in itself is quite transformative? can it be that the daily practice is transformative? guruji says, “do your practice and all is coming” not “come visit me in mysore every year and i will transform you.” there is also a LOT of maya in india. be careful, because often it’s spiritual trickery.

    there are thousands of students who are very hungry to learn traditional astanga. and not enough teachers to teach them. we are needed and wanted all over the world. when a teacher goes to mysore for however many months, it is teachers, often non-authorized ones, who take their place. because when you constantly leave your studio to study, you leave your students behind.

    i’m very tired of this holy attitude with people who go to mysore. the ones who really know (many certified ones) have an understanding that authorization does not mean anything as far as passing on the tradition with all their heart. these senior teachers (all who i respect and certified) depend on and use their own students who often are not authorized.

    if one can go to mysore for themselves and choose to teach the method, i think it’s a wonderful idea. even for a serious student.

    but the good ones are there for one reason. to be with guruji because they love him. and they don’t need to shout it to the world nor do they bother spitting on the low lifes like me who has never had any intention of getting the paper.

    some of us are too busy trying to help.

  27. kate said,

    August 20, 2008 at 7:51 am

    Ashtanga Anarchist said “Lastly, if this scheme is supposed to increase the level of teching in the ashtanga community why not go after the ever increasing number of people who have never studied in mysore with the family who are now offering teacher training courses?”

    How exactly would you do that? Get Sharath to ring them up and say “hello, it’s Sharath from Mysore, I know I haven’t even met you but I want you to stop doing teacher training”???

    They can only control/police/go after/supervise (whatever you want to call it) those teachers who are authorized by them and use the AYRI name to promote themselves. And I think they should have the right to keep an eye on the teachers they have authorized. If you don’t like the “rules”, well, it’s not like Sharath is forcing authorization on anyone. Quite the opposite.

  28. D said,

    August 20, 2008 at 10:49 am

    it’s disheartening that there is so much politics around this stuff. i wish ayri would exert this kind of influence when it comes to helping students around the world have a healthy, safe practice.

  29. yogini said,

    August 20, 2008 at 2:39 pm

    It seems that there is a lot of negativity around these changes by people who are not that into going to Mysore. If you don’t want the paper, are happy helping your teachers out when they go to practice in Mysore, that is great. Going to India can be transformative. But really one would need to be in India undertaking some sort of practice – which is exactly what people are doing in Mysore. Going on a Vipassanna or visiting Ramesh Balsekar can also be transformative, whatever you connect with and open to and spend enough time doing with awareness can be transformative.

    So of course going to Mysore is transformative. Not that daily practice alone is no trasnformative also. However to understand how guruji and sharath teach ashtanga yoga one needs to spend a great deal of time in their presence.

    Really, I don’t understand what the big deal is, either you connect with Mysore and go there and may be fortunate enough to be given guruji’s blessing to teach, or you stay at home still practicing daily and teach.

    Given that there is a set standard for becoming an ‘Ashtanga’ teacher people who teach without the blessing may feel somewhere not 100% comfortable with what they are doing. Otherwise I can’t really understand what the issue is, Jois and Sharath are well within their rights to monitor their teachers.

    Authorised and Certified teachers often get there students to cover classes. Hopefully, however, they are also doing the right thing and encouraging their students to visit mysore.

    Again, if you want to be qualified by AYRI you follow the rules. If not then don’t and don’t go to Mysore, do as you fell is right for you. It is pretty straight forward really.


  30. heather said,

    August 20, 2008 at 10:47 pm


    Well there seems to be a good mix of both!

    When I studied with Pattabhi Jois it was 2000….before the birth of Gokalum and crowded classes. This was part of the “old” way where at the time there were only 7-8 students practicing.

    I learned the primary series directly under Pattabis Jois; each day a new pose was added. He stood beside me to introduce the next pose. There was NO stopping at navasana. You either did it or you did not do it. At that time, there were also many people with injuried. The closing sequence was practised upstairs which also doubled as a changing room. I have very fond memories of that time. There is no doubt my practice soared to another level. In particular, I will always remember Pattabhi Jois nearly ripping my legs off in gardha pindasana.

    At that time, i was very new to the system….But I do know for a fact that there was NO written rule about teachers/students coming to Mysore annually. And there was certainly NO written rule about teachers NOT conducting workshop. This may have been the assumed ‘rule’ but it was not written in stone.

    In fact, the ‘workshop’ rule was first written to distinguish between workshops and teacher training courses. Teachers were NOT to call their workshops a form of teaching training in certication.

    The point being that if one desired certification, etc., that one needed to go to the source….that was to be made very clear to Western students. They might learn and be certfied by so and so in another country but if they wanted the ‘real” thing they would have to go to India!

    So, that makes good sense.

    Some people may not even be aware that below the authorication level was a term called ‘blessing.’ Lucy Scott received her ‘blessing’ from Guruji…..This distinction has slowly faded out and is not either authorication or certification.

    There can be no doubt that things have really changed since the 70′s. In fact, many of the students at that time used to wonder why no one was interested in Ashtanga!

    Ashtanga really hit the mainstream when celebrities such as Madonna and Sting began to take up the pratice. Prior to that it Ashtanga yoga was not well known…..

    The fiction is that people know only part of the story with respect to Ashtanga’s evolution and are quick to conclude that this is the way it always was.

    Either way people should take these discussions with a grain of salf and learn to see what you know vs what you think you know…vs what is fact….vs what is fiction.

  31. Chris in Scotland said,

    August 21, 2008 at 3:46 am

    In reference to all this:
    “yogas citta vritti nirodhah”

  32. K of Tokyo said,

    August 22, 2008 at 8:05 pm

    Where is, the so called, spirit of the yogi?

    There seems to be a lot of bitterness going around.

    Guruji’s love of bling is evident to anyone who cares to look at all the gold hanging on him. The Jois family don’t need any more money, does it?

    I’m sure we all understand the need for strict quality control in a potentially harmful activity such as yoga but the true spirit of sharing and speading love is being lost. I don’t see how these rules will help propagate Ashtanga. We may even lose some of the very good teachers we have now if they feel that they need to leave the Ashtanga family to continue to reach the practitioners who can tell the difference between a good teacher and just one with a paper to say they are good.

    Common sense will prevail.

    Love and Blessings to all.

  33. Craig said,

    August 24, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    I totally agree with bindifry. I know teachers who don thave the paper but are th ebest teachers and stick to teaching Ashtanga traditionally. They are even better than a couple of Certified teachers I know. It’s JUST paper people. Means nothing in my eyes. Doesn’t mean you’re a GREAT teacher just because you have the paper. Complete rubbish!!!

  34. rob said,

    August 25, 2008 at 7:39 am

    It saddens me that many of the posts here show a deep lack of respect for Guruji and Sharath. This is no way to speak about our teachers, the people who have done more than anyone to share this amazing practice with the world. From my experience practicing with Guruji and Sharath, their intention is always to preserve this method and tansmit it lovingly to anyone who is ready and willing to learn. I too was once a ‘tradition skeptic’ but if one thing has transformed my practice over the years it has been faith in the system and my teachers, the ability to put my ego aside and surrender. I am therefore eternally grateful to Guruji and Sharath for giving me the chance to discover and benefit from this.

  35. C said,

    August 27, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    rob, I entirely agree, and I am disenchanted by the navel-gazing focus on how the tightening of the teacher requirements affects the posters personally, as if that is the sole yardstick for measuring things.

    If people are so quick to disparage their teachers it automatically makes one question how devoted they are to the practice. Or to yoga generally. Or indeed, to simply being a decent human being. I am saying this as a traditional practitioner, but by no means a “true believer.” As such, I understand that one may sometimes disagree with one’s teachers, but to slight them in this way is beyond rude and completely graceless.

  36. soreknee said,

    August 27, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    I think says something fundamental about a practitioner who would never question or criticize their instructor. On the whole I don’t think this debate is without respect.
    The extremely high fees and restrictions evoke Scientology, which began, for those who don’t know, as an innocuous self-help method. We are adults and wanting to practice yoga, and since they make a point of saying it isn’t a religion, as much respect as we have for the masters, I think we deserve a better explanation.
    For instance, if they are going to create standards that involve routine travel to India and a very high level of practice, doesn’t it beg the question of why there is no measure of how good a teacher someone is? Personal transmission or not, just being able to do it does not mean you can teach someone else to. And that’s something I’m 100% sure of.
    Just because a discussion becomes unpleasant doesn’t mean you should look away or shrug it off.

  37. (0v0) said,

    August 27, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    Yeah, the most interesting thing that seems to be coming out here is the different feelings we all have about how much you can question authority.

    I feel like this is natural, and it’s ok. Some people here come from cultures that practice filial piety and ancestor worship and have honestly benefited from surrender to teachers—both because it creates a love relationiship and because it quiets the mind. For others, questioning ultimata is itself a form of teacher relationship—it can be a way of showing respect for a tradition by holding it to high standards and wanting to understand it personally. Questioning is not always disrespectful… throughout this thread it is often a way of expressing frustration in relationship and seeking to make that better. Yoga… resolution of opposition… union… relationship…: it’s ok.

    For me, as an American interested in practical spirituality grounded in my own immediate experience, of course the second disposition is where I started. A tradition that will not tolerate critical thinking would be hard for me to adopt. But over time I’ve found myself bracketing the critical mind in my relationships with yoga teachers—because it’s a joy to let them do the thinking while I quiet my mind. So both a little iconoclasm and a lot of surrender make sense to me.

    That said, I see two different emotions underlying the detractions here. One is love (“why concern yourself with this—where is your gratitude?”). The other is FEAR (“you know Sharath is reading this, right?”)

    When you try to use FEAR to silence meaningful inquiry, that indeed will alienate sincere practitioners. It is sad to see that happening here, just as it is sad to see a certain forgetting of gratitude. When your own mind is full of fear, is it truly quiet? Is fear the same as faith?

    Sharath has an amazing role to play, carrying this tradition among practitioners with different ways of engaging their practice and relating with teachers. It’s not like everyone can jump on an ancestor-worship or authority-glorifying track and have that work for them in a genuine way. Some, yes. Others have different “karma,” and this doesn’t make us hopeless ashtangis. On the contrary! (Ashtanga’s still about “research,” right? Please tell me the research is not gone though the AYRI is no more.)

    Working with eastern and western (and etc) students at the same time must be so hilariously challenging, but I have a feeling Sharath has the insight, love and modern global sophistication to do it.

  38. Ashtanga anarchist said,

    August 29, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Sharath has the insight, love and modern global sophistication to do it.

    Have you ever met sharath? if you think this is a step in the right direction I think you are sadly mistaken. It is all about control.

    Non authorised teachers have carte blanche to do as they will yet sharath wants to impose his authority on those he can. I know a number of senior teachers are quietly fuming about the tone of Sharath’s letter (if you can call it that because I very much doubt he wrote it). Yoga is about liberation. Does this move liberate or ensnare us?

  39. soreknee said,

    August 30, 2008 at 6:11 am

    Those same senior teachers won’t be so quiet in the not-too-distant future, methinks. Change is inevitable. Change is afoot.

  40. t. said,

    September 1, 2008 at 6:10 am

    I complete agree that more respect is needed in this discussion.

    Guruji and Sharath have dedicated their lives to sharing this method, and that is deserving of respect. If a teacher wishes to be authorised or certified there are guidelines to follow, if they don’t wish to be then of course they may do as they please! Perhaps for some this is the best choice in terms of their teaching. The guidelines are pretty clear now and people can choose to accept them, or not.

    While one may engage in questioning of the system, it’s methods and the standards set by Jois & Sharath for recognition as ‘authorised’ or certified’, or even their approach to teaching, comments such as this demonstrate a clear lack of respect:

    “If we are to follow the example of our teachers, as the guru parampara tradition dictates, we would all became avaricious, wealth obsessed and suffer from almost crippling back pain as Sharath regularly does.”

    Question freely, openly and respectfully. That way hopefully the questioning will lead to answers which help us all to live a life liberated from suffering, rather than creating more negativity in a world which clearly doesn’t need it.

  41. soreknee said,

    September 1, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    t., that does nothing to address any of the very legitimate concerns raised by some of the other posts. Nearly all authorized teachers offer Workshops which are not only helpful to students in many ways, but a way of earning a living.
    The comment you quoted was written by someone who (claims to be) is authorized.
    As a practitioner it actually does concern me that Sharath is suffering from horrible back pain. The high fees charged by KPJAYI are the stuff of legend in India.
    To be a certified Iyengar teacher takes 10 years and there are many levels of approval. To be sure there is rigidity and politics in that system as with any, but they are clearly interested in creating a select community of truly committed and knowledgeable teachers. To quote Richard Freeman, Ashtanga is often taught by neophytes, which he describes as an embarrassment. There really is no system in place to determine who is a great teacher, only measure individual proficiency with asana. And as many here besides myself have attested, that is not nearly the makings of a great teacher.

  42. t. said,

    September 1, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    It is true that being an authorised teacher does not necessarily make one a good teacher, however it does mean that the person has spent a certain amount of time in Mysore, that they teach according to the method taught by guruji (ie; no skipping postures) and that they themselves have a teacher which they return to every 18 months.

    Regarding asana level of attainment, this is only one aspect of authorisation & certification, alongside correct attitude of devotion and respect. The minnimum requirement for authorisation is that one must be able to to the primary series proficiently, which is fair enough.

    In terms of workshops by authorised teachers, certified teachers still can conduct these workshops and given that a number of them travel extensively this is an option for students without a teacher in their area. Also, teaching workshops is not really the method that guruji and sharath encourage. they may teach led class when on tour, but the focus on “how to jump through” “how to improve your backbends or “teaching intensives” are clearly not the essence of ashtanga yoga as taught in Mysore.

    Because it is likely that authorised teachers have less experience with the practice & teaching than certified teachers it makes sense that they should focus on teaching every morning in the mysore style at a home studio. Regular travel is also disruptive to practice.

    Anyhow there are more than enough teachers for people to learn with. But if someone chooses to study under an authorised or certified teacher at least they know there is a base level of practice, a commitment to professional development and continuity in their teaching style and how ashtanga is taught in India.

  43. (0v0) said,

    September 1, 2008 at 9:15 pm

    Question. Not being either snarky or obsequious here, just trying to puzzle this out…

    Is Sharath’s experience in his body—whether the pain be related to practice or teaching or both—a personal matter? It it rejected here for another reason—that it is just really disrespectful to discuss? Or is this something to be open about—either because it gives a chance to have compassion for him or because as one of the most advanced in the series his practice is an example of the method?

    It seems odd to me that talking about his back should be dismissed out of hand as disrespectful, even though we often don’t want to discuss injuries and keep them as “personal” matters. I’m glad *he* talks about his back to students; and I have a sense that we can be honest about what he goes through without it being offensive.

    Am I kidding myself, t.? Maybe this really should be out of bounds for all discussion, because it hurts students’ faith or something…. is that the trouble with it?

  44. t. said,

    September 1, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    Dear OvO,

    If you read the quote in totality that I refer to I would think the bit that says “avaricious and wealth obsessed” is probably the most inappropriate part of that quote to my mind. The way in which his back pain is referred to is hardly compassionate, of course everyone can discuss his embodied experience as they please, but the use of “avaricous” and “wealth obsessed” is quite unnecessary.

    My faith is not at all “hurt” by Sharath’s back pain. In fact his passion “to heal through yoga” to use his own words is inspirational. I have experienced a great deal of pain through Astanga practice, but have seen the practice through under the guidance of guruji and sharath and have found that, viewed as a life long practice, Ashtanga can be very healing. This, I know is not everyone’s experience, but it is mine.

    Again, I am not asking that people don’t question, diasagree with new teaching standards, but feel that these discussions can be much more constructive than what we have seen here.


  45. (0v0) said,

    September 1, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    Thanks, t. Makes sense.

  46. finally! said,

    September 2, 2008 at 8:15 am

    t., it’s so nice to read your measured, calm, and respectful comments here. Enough of this sky-is-falling stuff. Avaricious, wealth obsessed? Ugh!

    I see nothing wrong with a little quality control among traditional, committed teachers–those who would choose to be authorized. No one’s forcing them.

  47. soreknee said,

    September 3, 2008 at 9:53 am

    The aspirant unfortunately has to be savvy enough to temper faith with reason. Those teachers who are authorized and have learned all of Primary and Intermediate Series from Guruji have, in fact, been forced to reckon with the new rules – which are actually a bit different from the old ones. Under the new rules, the authorized teachers all over the world who have taught second series postures for years as they felt they had ‘authorization’ to do will have to stop.
    And as a student who only seeks to practice optimally – and that includes incurring the minimum amount of injuries – it’s a little disappointing to see what amounts to blind faith among so many teachers and students. It makes one realize that a senior teacher who employs blocks, straps, modified poses or any other modality purely for the benefit of the earnest student is actually being incredibly vigilant and brave.
    Furthermore another fantastic element about traveling workshops is that it fosters a community (sangha!) in a way that practicing locally doesn’t. Beyond that many of Guruji’s disciples have wildly different takes on the practice and it behooves one to go out and experience them. Doing so basically saved my ass!

  48. Javier said,

    September 6, 2008 at 6:07 am

    Hi dear yogis!!, my name its Javier im from Mexico, im starting my life in the practice of Yoga, i have study marketing and administration and im saving money for more than one year to go and practice Yoga in Mysore with Guruji for 4 months if i get more money 5 or 6, nobody says that this was easy, i have change me life to start this, and it will not stop. Im living now in London, working a lot of hours in things that are not my passion, practicing Yoga is something that im loving now and keeps my alive. Its the first time that i enter to this site, i feel weird a little affraid and confused, reading all this stuff uff, but i know that it will pass when i close the window. Im affraid to ask my self the same questions, i have never being ther!! and im going the first day of December. Im confused about all these things about being a teacher and the papers or titles that they talk about *cetificate, master , teacher i dont understand nothing.
    Before thinking in Yoga i always thought in money and how to get it!! its very difficult and its hard work also, now i dont think on it anymore, all is coming. Every person its looking for getting something of something, this is and advantage in the end, we are always looking for something. Im looking for studying Yoga, not for certificates, because i want to feel better in my life, and at the end of the time i get something extra for sure. Every teacher its a teacher because its looking for something and one of them its getting money maybe not the first one but its ther, i dont feel that i could be a teacher i see it to far now, not because of these new rules, because i need to go to india and practice more with the people that now about this, i choose ashtanga because it looks to be one of the most difficult ones to get the teachers degree and i like that.
    When i finish my practice in Mysore i will go back to work hard, save money, practice Yoga, take care of my family and pray a lot to go back to Mysore for my blessing, not the blessing for being a teacher only of the company.
    If someone its going this December i will love to hear news and recommendations.

  49. bob said,

    September 25, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    It´s quite sad that now everybody can teach. To get authorisation you need to practice few years.. and then you can start to take a same amount of money from your teaching like we who have practice allmost 20 years. And now world is TOO FULL of teachers with very minor skills of adjustments, to understand spiritual problems of student. I am thinkin same, that ayri is not doing right thing to just give those “primary serie licence to teach”, without check the skills of students. couse doing asanas, dont mean that you can teach at all !! (Like Sharath, he is doing difficult poses, but hes teaching skills are nothing even “great”, he is NOT good teacher. If there start to be alot of teachers with samek skill level like Sharath.. So there should be tests, just like drivinglisence. It should be very long, you should know all the vinyasa, you should perform alot of adjustmens, ofcourse you should perform your asana practice, tell the history and philosophy of yoga, and there should be like Guruji, Sharath, Saraswati, Sharmila, Manju ect. checking your mental state. There should not be this wierd list of those beginners who can teach only primary.. really.. if you cant teach intermediet, you cant teach any beginners, and you really do not are not respectful teacher, who have nollage of S.K.P.Jois tradition.

    Now a days i dont belive in sertification eather. there should be serious TEST, not just some “practice 4 years” and you can carry our Yoga Communitys name like youre own, and you can take money so much that you got balls. This authoration is very new thing.. it should be first thing to take a way and forget that JOKE of possibility to be first series yoga teacher.

  50. nico108 said,

    September 30, 2008 at 5:19 am

    There seems to be a lot of confusion in regards to these “new” rules. I hope I can add a bit of clarity as t. and a few others have done before me.

    1. These rules are not set in stone. On the AYRI website, the minimum requirements are listed—the rest is on a case by case, or “individual” basis.

    2. It is clearly stated that teaching authorization is to be offered not given, and further that a student should come to Mysore not expecting to be authorized (or in other words, not expecting a career change) but in order to practice.

    3. That in order to become a teacher one must offer respect, or parampara, to the teacher, or guru. I am sad to say that I have rarely seen respect given to Sharath or to Patabhi Jois in any meaningful manner, beyond the briefest of touching of feet. Respect to a teacher sadly goes against our critical culture, and is an anathema in many ways to how we were raised. Thus I think it becomes one of the greatest obstacles to overcome in our practice (even more so than marichasana d!)

    I think it shows a grave disrespect to the Jois family to criticize the amount of money they have or have not taken in. We have modeled them in our own image of what a guru should be and then complained when they have not lived up to it. I would like to believe that perhaps Sharath has learned the power of the practice and wants to retain some of its purity. Perhaps he authorized too many people in the last few years, perhaps he was drawn t the excitement of international stardom. That may all be true (though we cannot know) and perhaps now he realizes the harm that that same dilution has caused to the practice. I think it is great that he exercises more control over the teachers. Sadly in the last few years far too many people have claimed to be teachers of some sort or another.

  51. pd said,

    October 4, 2008 at 2:20 pm

    Having stayed in Mysore, I have the greatest respect for Guruji, Saraswati, and Sharath, and their entire family. Kinder people have I never met. Totally, the problem lies with the students. Some go there with all their baggage and are in no way “transformed,” but only enhanced in their narcissism. I met and practiced with so many excellent individuals who were there to enance their lives. Yet some were there who had egotistic cultic aspirations, and drew Guruji and Sharath’s kindness into their web. It’s a business, Baby; not a religious movement. I you don’t like it, don’t go there and go screw yourself.

  52. Yuko said,

    October 7, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Back to the Yoga.
    We all have different reasons for practicing yoga and each should be honoured on their path. Respecting each’s journey, let’s work together on this.

    It is the power of the Intelligence of the Ashtanga practice that is to be celebrated. Although it is in part a big Thank You to Guruji and his family and numerous teachers for being a part of introducing this practice to the world, it’s not about one main person who transmits the practice, but rather about each individual who practices Ashtanga and implements their time on their mat, off the mat. By becoming their own guru each soul has a drastic impact on their life bringing about transformation enabling them to respond to life rather than react to the wonders of Life causing the most amazing ripple effect beyond one’s possible imagination.

    The need for tradition will always be around, so setting a few ‘rules’ will ensure the tradition survives in its purest form remembering evolution is also necessary (what would it be like if we still believed the earth was flat and that the sun revolved around earth?).

    To avoid any confusion, perhaps an appropriate solution could be, as in the Kundalini tradition (Kundalini as taught by Yogi Bhajan), ‘traditional’ Ashtanga could be referred to as ‘Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga as taught by Sri K Pattabhi Jois’. Any classes taught by not ‘authorized/certified’ teachers could be refered to simply as Ashtanga Yoga. Afterall, if Ashtanga refers to Patanjali’s 8 limbs, then truly the practice is open to all.

  53. blisterkist said,

    October 11, 2008 at 9:59 pm

    Related to parampara the Dalai Lama says the following:
    “This (the taking of a teacher) should be done in accordance with your interest and disposition, but you should analyze well. You must investigate before accepting a lama or teacher or guru to see whether that person is really qualified or not. It is said in a scripture that just as fish that are hidden under the water can be seen through the movement of the ripples from above, so also a teacher’s inner qualities can, over time, be seen a little through that person’s behavior.
    We need to look into the person’s scholarship — the ability to explain topics — and whether the person implements those teachings in his or her conduct and experience.”
    The critical attitude that Nico108 derides seems, on the advice of the Dalai Lama, to be an essential factor in seeking out a teacher/lama/guru.
    Is it a form of ‘grave disrespect’ to take issue with Patthabi Jois sitting behind his electronic money counter at the registration desk in the shala or to question the excessive fees for studying in mysore? Or is it rather our duty to consider the contrast between this behavior and the demands made by the sacred texts in the yoga tradition for a life of greedless simplicity. Would the Dalai Lama not have us ask the kind of questions that ashtangis seem so willing to gloss over or ignore, the difficult questions that relate to money and behaviour in a tradition that originally and in all its sacred texts demands a commitment to asceticism.? How many women who have studied directly with SKPJ have been made uncomfortable by being kissed on the lips after touching his feet? How many of us have watched this happened and shrugged it off, made excuses or, for the sake of the practice and the notion of a sacred tradition, just tried to ignore it?
    The Dalai Lama gives us advice for seeking and critically assessing a teacher, a horde of sacred texts provide the requirements for being one. It is not a question of forcing the guru/lama/tacher to conform to our idea of what he or she should be, but asking whether he or she conforms to the demands and strictures of their own sacred tradition.
    The notion of the unbroken lineage that is central to parampara forces us to ask if Patanjali, the river’s head of classical yoga, directly transmitted the lineage in an unbroken line to those who now wear Rolexes.
    The Dalai Lama would encourage anyone seeking a teacher/lama/guru to critically assess that person’s behavior. The fact that western students en masse refer to SKPJ as their Guru with little exposure to the man (besides their one or two adjustments per month and their offer of substantial shala fees) forces one to ask whether a more, not less critical approach is required if the tradition of Classical Yoga is to be preserved and transmitted.
    Parampara implies the direct, continuous and unbroken transmission of a lineage. Do you believe that this has taken place in those that you refer to as your teachers? Does their behavior truly attest to this? Are you forced to ignore or excuse certain actions or behaviors in order to maintain the idea of a truly unbroken, sacred tradition? Is parampara a loose enough garment to enshroud modern paradoxes about money, consumption, and contact with the opposite sex and to excuse your chosen teachers actions in all these areas?
    What is remarkable in contemporary yoga practice is the lack of iconoclastic fury so present in the Zen tradition, where there is a living and continuous engagement and debate about the notion of transmission. I believe that the Dalai Lama would be more attuned to the Soto school’s mockery and subversion of anyone claiming to be a teacher, and to the very idea that there is anything to be taught, than he would be to our common and too often unquestioning acceptance of the behavior, methods and revelations of our teachers.

  54. Konno said,

    October 14, 2008 at 1:18 am

    Anyone know why there are no certified or autorised indian teaachers of ashtanga yoga, outside the jois family?

  55. dessi said,

    October 14, 2008 at 4:36 am

    There used to be a few on the old list.
    There also used to be a lot more great teachers on the list.

  56. Grimmly said,

    October 15, 2008 at 1:16 am

    Just to add some perspective to Blisterkiss’ comment. She/he appears to be mixing traditions. The Dali Lama is Buddhist as is the scriptual tradition Blisterkiss is refering to concerning the questioning of a teacher (teacher rather than Guru in the buddhist tradition) Zen too, is of course Buddism.

    PKJ is coming from the Hindu tradition.

    The Dali Lama’s comment and the scriptures B refers to are probably derived from the fourth of the Four reliances. Teaching that are suposed to have come direct from the Buddha. Interesting to note the other three

    Rely on the message of the teacher, not on his personality;
    Rely on the meaning, not just on the words;
    Rely on the real meaning, not on the provisional one;
    Rely on your wisdom mind, not on your ordinary, judgmental mind.

    It’s interesting to consider the role of Guru from another tradition but important to make clear that it is another traditon (in this case Buddhist) we, traditionally questioning, westerners are applying/employing/deploying.

  57. swaroopa said,

    October 15, 2008 at 6:33 am

    Inspiring knowledge. Thank you for this comment and it is truly well placed here in this topic and really very interesting.
    Just a question please…
    So do you mean our feelings for a particular Guru/ Teacher are ‘warped’. As I do agree we deploy/project/analise too much. But it is directly out of desire and fear ?
    So the circle continues…we go to a Guru/ Teacher for help in ridding these dis-eases yet we pick more up along the way?
    What are they to do with us?

  58. (0v0) said,

    October 15, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    Thanks, Grim. This is an interesting and learned comment.

    Could someone say more about what an actual guru relationship would look like in the Hindu tradition? From the popular books (Autobiography of a Yogi and the writings of Ram Dass and his contemporaries), I guess we all have a picture of very unique personal relationships that begin after a period of student searching and pretty rigorous inquiry. The two regularities I can see is that (1) Hindu guru relationships are emphatically not a fee-for-service kind of thing and that (2) any one who demands to be treated as a guru is… definitely not a guru.

    But… these things all get mixed up at some point. Are we in the Hindu system, Zen system, Tibetan or Vajrayana system…? Who cares? For those of us who are not Hindu Shavaite Brahmins, seems the one model that even makes sense at all is that set by the first westerners who went to India and took a teacher. How did that work… and did it work? Indra Devi and Mark Whitwell are the westerners Krishnamacharya took as his students. Westerners who want to do the guru thing… wouldn’t we want to understand those bridge-builders’ experiences as part of choosing/creating a path?

    Whitwell is still teaching all over the world. He a simple articulation of nondual practice and easily inhabits the lineage as it is without getting confused at all. I won’t share what he sees has been lost in the most recent generation of the tradition.

  59. swaroopa said,

    October 15, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    Times are changin’….
    Or is it just ‘the lucky ones’…..

  60. KostaN said,

    November 3, 2008 at 6:32 am

    I really can´t see some of the older people, like those who have a 30 years practice behind them, to have some respect for Sharath´s attitude as a teacher. I mean, these guys where in mysore praticing advanced series when Sharath was a kid! Those who started this yoga when Sharath was already teaching and are willing to submit under his control, it is fine. But in my opinion these guys are far better experienced than him in many aspects of yoga. When SKPJ leaves his body the split within many ashtanga seniors and sharath will be inevitable.

    Somebody from the Jois family told me regarding his money and control manners: ” I am very dissapointed at him”.

    I have the deepest respect for this lineage, but the jois family are teachers and not owners of the timeless yoga.

    Just as you don´t have to visit the pope to be a good christian, you do not need their approaval to be a true ashtangi. Just lots of dedication and love for this beatiful practice.


  61. robyn said,

    December 2, 2008 at 5:36 am

    If something is not complicated and does not involve something to argue over, it is not worth doing. Isn’t that the way we human beings seem to make everything out to be. It’s yoga. Be happy and breathe.

  62. laura said,

    June 1, 2009 at 2:36 am

    live well and free and let live well and free!
    learn your chosen method well through ALL the good sources you can find, take what’s good, effective and reasonable and leave out all the rest! breath freely, trust your inner guidance and enjoy your journey!

  63. Bhavesh said,

    July 11, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    I don’t know how many of you have had a professional certification and license. If you have you know that there are requirements that require ongoing education. This is necessary to protect the public and maintain a high level of service/practice etc. The amount of continuing education and authorized sources is governed by those issuing the certifications.

    If AYI want’s to be the only place to get that continuing education it may be because they want to have more control over what is being taught to certified teachers. If it were my organization I would create a core of teachers who are authorized to teach these continuing education courses. If you do not maintain a set minimum of CE hours then you lose your cert. That is a normal practice for many types of professional certifications.

    I don’t think it’s all about money although it’s obvious that is part of it. If cert teachers are allowed to teach up to their proficiency level I see no problem with that. If a cert teacher gives workshops I see no problem with that. If the AYI is saying that no teacher can do that it is simply to force more business for themselves.

  64. Bhavesh said,

    July 19, 2010 at 8:25 am

    Ekshtanga Yoga

    Has anyone ever asked why KPJAYI only teaches Asana? They admittedly do not teach anything besides asana.This is supposed to be Ashtanga Yoga after all. As you all know Asht means 8. The 8 limbs are comprised of:

    1. Yama,
    2. Niyama,
    3. Asana,
    4 .Pranayama,
    5. Prathyahar,
    6. Dharan,
    7. Dhyana,
    8 .Samadhi.

    Why do they not teach any of the other limbs? Are they assuming the Westerners can’t comprehend anything but asanas? Sounds like KPJAYI should change the name of the style of yoga they teach to Ekshtanga Yoga.

  65. phetteaccerty said,

    October 21, 2010 at 9:07 pm

    [url=]xbox live[/url]

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment

The Flickr API returned error code #95: SSL is required